A study of the degree of similarity in the style of the letters of Nahj al-Balaghah in terms of vocabulary richness in light of Johnson's theory and Honore's equation

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Kharazmi University, Tehran

2 PhD student, Arabic Language and Literature, Kharazmi University, Tehran

Abstract

How words are chosen, as well as how they are put together in sentences, have an important role in conveying the intended meaning to the audience. Studying and analyzing each person's style carefully will help us greatly in understanding the implications of its effects. The style is the way to create the idea, and to highlight it in the appropriate verbal form. Stylistics is the analysis of an expression, a description of its purpose, and its effect. Finch believes that stylistics is one area of modern linguistics that analyzes literary styles. Each choice of language can be considered a stylistic indicator. The main task of stylistics is to examine the type of word choice, and why one option is preferred over the other.
There are multiple trends in this field, including: Statistical stylistics, and all studies around it have been conducted on the assumption that finger print is possible. Statistical stylistics is one of the most important recent trends of new rhetoric that studies the characteristics of writing style. Each author creates a style unique to himself through the special placement of words. Statistical methods by converting quantity to quality, lead to scientific judgment on the studied texts. One of the most notable stylistic features is “vocabulary richness” that can be used to analyze literary styles. The basis of vocabulary richness theories is that the fewer words in a text are repeated in relation to another text, the more vocabulary richness it has.
The imams are more interested in taking into account the context of the public situation than any other person, and they convey to them the required concepts by choosing the appropriate words. In this research, we shed light on the method of writing, and the choice of words by Imam Ali (peace be upon him) in the letters of Nahj al-Balaghah to obtain the degree of similarity of how it was stated in the letters, as well as how to use the repeated vocabulary appropriately with the situation of the addressee, through the descriptive-analytical, and statistical approach.
For this purpose, we chose Johnson's theory and Honore's equation to calculate vocabulary richness. Since one of the conditions for improving the application of vocabulary richness theories is the equality of the number of vocabulary selected texts, as well as their similarity in some areas, we select the messages that have similar topics.
The messages of Nahj al-Balagha have been classified into 19 categories according to their different topics:
1- historical, political; 2- political; 3- Ethical, economic; 4- Military, political; 5- Ethical, political; 6- political, belief; 7- Military; 8- Military, moral; 9- Ethical; 10- Economic; 11- Ethical, political, historical, doctrinal; 12- Ethical, educational, historical, belief, economic, political, scientific; 13- political, economic; 14- Ethical, political, belief; 15- political, moral, economic; 16- Spiritual, devotional; 17- political, moral, economic, devotional; 18- historical; 19- Political, scientific.
In this research, the second category (ie political messages) was selected, which contains 23 messages. We choose five messages from this category as the sample for research. The letter No. 29, 33, 35, 38 and 63 is our statistical community, and by comparing its vocabulary richness, we study the degree of similarity in the writing style of Imam Ali (peace be upon him) on the similar subject.
The number of words for the selected samples in this study ranges between 84 and 138, and since one of the conditions for a good comparison is an equal number of vocabulary words for the studied texts, to apply Johnson’s theory we choose the first 80 words for each of the selected letters, and divide each sample into four parts (20 words). Then we draw an independent table for all samples, and cross out each repeated word, according to the frequency criteria. For the R equation, after counting the words used once, as well as the non-recurring words, we calculate the value of the equation for each of the letters selected in this study.
One of the most important results that we reached is that the difference of the highest vocabulary richness and the lowest for the selected letters, according to Johnson’s theory, is 11%, and according to Honore’s equation is only 15%, and this is indicative of the similar style of writing political letters from Nahj al-Balaghah. However, the slight difference between the vocabulary richness of the selected samples is related to the influence of the circumstances and reasons for writing each of these letters, for example: the type of the addressee, how he behaves, the need to deal with him, encouragement or incitement to an important matter, and these differences are not to the point of causing great differences in the style of the letters.

Keywords

Main Subjects


بررسی میزان شباهت سبک نامه­های نهج البلاغه از نظر غنای واژگانی

بر اساس نظریة جانسون و معادلة هونور

علی پیرانی شال [1]

سميه مديری [2]

چکیده

از قرن شانزدهم میلادی، بلاغت دچار رکود شد. بعد از جنگ جهانی دوم، متخصصان تلاش کردند تا دوباره به بلاغت، اعتبار ببخشند. بلاغت جدید در زمینه­های مختلفی به تحلیل متون می­پردازد. سبک­شناسی آماری، یکی از مهم­ترین گرایش­های جدید است که به بررسی ویژگی­های سبک نوشتاری می­پردازد. روش­های آماری، با تبدیل کردن کمیت به کیفیت، از اظهار نظر شخصی در مورد متون جلوگیری می­کنند. یکی از ویژگی­های سبک­شناسی، غنای واژگانی است. جانسون یکی از نظریه پردازان در این زمینه بوده که با محاسبة نسبت کلمات غیر تکراری به کل کلمات، به غنای واژگانی متن دست می­یابد. روش دیگر، معادلة هونور است. در جستار حاضر، غنای واژگانی نامه­های سیاسی نهج البلاغه بر اساس نظریة جانسون و معادلة هونور، جهت بررسی میزان شباهت آنها و همچنین تأثیر شرایط اجتماعی بر چگونگی انتخاب کلمات توسط امام علی (ع) مقایسه شده است. روش تحقیق، توصیفی-تحلیلی و آماری است. نتایج تحقیق حاکی از آن است که اختلاف بیش­ترین و کم­ترین غنای واژگانی در نامه­های انتخاب شده، طبق نظریة جانسون، 11% و طبق معادلة هونور، 15% است. لذا سبک نوشتاری نامه­های سیاسی نهج البلاغه، مشابه است. اختلاف اندک میان غنای واژگانی نامه­ها به دلیل تأثیر شرایط اجتماعی و دلیل نگارش هریک از آنهاست؛ از جمله: نوع مخاطب، شیوة رفتار وی، تشویق مخاطب برای انجام کاری مشخص.

واژه­های کلیدی: غنای واژگانی، تكرار، نظریة جانسون، معادلة هونور، نهج البلاغه

 

[1] دانشیار گروه زبان و ادبیات عربی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران (نویسنده مسئول) pirani@khu.ac.ir  

[2] دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات عربی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران s.modiri@khu.ac.ir

 

  • Biblography:

    • Anaari, E. & Omidvar, A. (2012). Research on the diversity of poetic words; A case study of the poems of Rahi Moayeri, Houshang Ebtehaj and Fereydoon Moshiri. Literary Criticism and Stylistics Research. Number 10. 31-58. [In Persian]
    • Arab Yusof Abadi, A.; Mahmudi, R. & Ahmadi, M. (2020). Statistical stylistics al-Hadid and at-taghabun based on Johnson. Journal of Koranic Studies in Literature. 4(7). Pp. 47-62. [In Persian]
    • Atigh, O. (2012). The science of rhetoric between tradition and modernity. Amman: Dar Osama. [In Arabic]
    • Ayad, Sh. (1982). An introduction to stylistics. Saudi Arabia: Dar Al Uloom for printing and publishing. [In Arabic]
    • Beheshtipoor, F. & Nazari, A. (2021). Stylistic Comparison of Lexical Richness and its Implication in Meccan and Medinan Surahs. Research in the Arabic language. 13(24). Pp. 75-100. [In Arabic]
    • Biber, Douglas. (1995), Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Compariso, Cambridge University Press.
    • Bleeth, H. (1989). Rhetoric and style. Translation: Mohammad Al-Omari. Publications on the principles of  Fas. [In Arabic]
    • Bond Shahriari, A. & Seyed rezaie (2014). Comparing the Poetry of Forough Farrokhzad, Farzaneh. Khujand and Khaledeh Forough from the Perspective of Johnsons Theory. Research of contemporary world literature. 19(1). Pp. 45-61. [In Persian]
    • Dashti, M. (2016). Dictionary of general topics of  the Nahj al-Balagha. [In Persian]
    • Davari Dolatabadi, M. & Omidvar, A. (2020).Measuring the Vocabulary Variation Feature in Literary Style, A Comparative Study of Examples of Proses by Ibn al-Motafa, Jahiz and Abu Hajin Tohidi. Research in the Arabic language. Number 22. Pp. 97-112. [In Arabic]
    • Ebadi, R. (2016). Comparison of the variety of vocabulary in style between Arabic and Persian authorities (authorities of Badi-ol-Zaman Hamedani, hadiths of Ibn Darid and Hamidi authorities). Research in Comparative Literature. 5(18). Pp. 147-164. [In Persian]
    • Fottohi, M. (2011). Stylistics. Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian]
    • Herdan G. (1964), On Communication between Linguistics. Linguistics, vol. (9): 71-76.
    • Honore, A. (1979). Some Simple Measures of Richness of Vocabulary. Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing Bulletin. 7(2). 172-177.
    • Hussein, Abdul Qadir (2001). Al Mukhtasar in the History of Rhetoric. Cairo: Dar Gharib. [In Arabic]
    • Ibn Abi Al-Hadid. (2006). The Explanation of  the Nahj al-Balagha. Research: Mohammad Abolfazl Ibrahim. Qom: The Library of the Great Ayatollah Al-Marashi Al-Najafi. [In Arabic].
    • Ibn Manzur (1992). Lisan Al Arab, Beirut: Dar Sader. [In Arabic]
    • Makarem Shirazi, N. (2011). Message of Imam Amir al-Mo'menin (PUH). Qom: Ali Ibn Abi Talib (PUH) Publications. [In Persian].
    • Al-Masadi, A. stylistics and style. Tunisia: Arab Book House. [In Arabic].
    • Maslouh, S. (1992). Style, Statistical linguistic study. Cairo: The world of  the books. [In Arabic].
    • -------- (1993). In the literary text, A stylistic statistical study. Cairo: Eyes for human and social studies and researchs. [In Arabic].
    • Meshbaal, M. (2007). Rhetoric and origins. Morocco: East Africa. [In Arabic].
    • Modiri, S. (2018). Comparison between Nahj al-Balagha and Al-Sahifa al-Sajjadiyya on the basis of statistical stylistics. A thesis prepared to obtain a master's degree. Professor Supervisor: Isa MotaghiZadeh. Tarbiat Modares University. [In Arabic]
    • Molaie, A. (2012). Stylistic feature of Vocabulary frequency (practical assessment of selected poems by Mutnabi, Ibn Hana Andalusi and Ahmad Shoghi). Arabic language and literature. Number 7. Pp. 151-175. [In Persian]
    • Morteza, A. & Sedghi, H. (2012). Word variety in literary styles (with a comparative study of Khalil Jibran, Manfaluti and Reyhani's writings). Studies in Arabic language and literature. Number 12. Pp. 111-175. [In Arabic]
    • Motaghizadeh, I., Hajikhani, A., & Modiri, S. (2020). The balance between the Nahj al-Balagha and the Sahifah Sajjadiah  based on the statistical study according to the theories of  Busemann and Johnson. Horizons of  Islamic Civilization, (2) 22, 131-157. [In Arabic].
    • Naazem, H. (2002). The stylistic structures, a study in the Al-Matar chant of Sayyab, Morocco: The Arab Cultural Center for Publishing, Casablanca. [In Arabic].
    • Nazemian, H. (2006). Measuring the property of vocabulary diversity in style (an applied study of samples from the writings of Muhammad Mandour, Sayyid Qutb and Muhammad Ghonimi Hilal). Arabic language and its literature. Number 3. Pp. 107-128. [In Arabic].
    • Al-omri, M. (2012). The new rhetoric between imagination and deliberation. Morocco: East Africa. [In Arabic]
    • Parvin, N.; Shoshtari, M. & Rafiei, M. (2020). Comparing Lexical Diversity in the Oral and Written Style of the Nahjolbalaghah according to Johnson’s Theory (Case Study: Political-Moral Sermons and Letters). Studies of Islamic texts. 4(2). Pp. 149-164. [In Persian]
    • Al-Rawandi, Qutbuddin (1991). The method of ingenuity in explaining Nahj al-Balaghah. om: Ayatollah Marashi Najafi Public Library. [In Arabic]
    • Sedghi, H. & Azimi, K. (2008). Measuring the Diversity of Vocabulary in Style in the Field of Committed Literature: An Applied Study of Examples of Poetry by Dabel Al-Khuzai, Al-Sharif Al-Radi and Mihyar Al-Dailami. Iranian Scientific Society of Arabic Language and Literature, No. 10, Pp. 1-17. [In Arabic]
    • Sedghi, H.; Sharif Askari & Zare Dorniani (2013). Measuring Vocabulary Diversity of Property in Style. Arabic language and literature. Number 3. Pp. 29-45. [In Arabic]
    • Sharif  Razi, M. (2015). Nahj al-Balagha . Translation: Mohammad Dashti. Tehran: Message of Justice. [In Persian].
    • Shokri, M. (1992). An Introduction to Stylistics, Mubarak Public Library. [In Arabic]
    • Hoover, D.L. (2003). “Another Perspective on Vocabulary Richness”, Computers and the Humanities, No. 37, Pp. 151-178.
    • Stamatatos, E. (2009). “A survey of modern authorship attribution methods”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. volume 60. issue 3. Pp. 538-556.
    • Stamatatos E., Fakotakis N., and Kokkinakis G.  (2000). Automatic Text Categorization in Terms of Genre and Author. Computational Linguistics, 26(4), 471-495.
    • Torruella, J. & Capsada, R. (2013). Lexical Statistics and Tipological Structures: A Measure of Lexical Richness. 5th International Conference on Corpus Linguistics. 447-454.
    • Tweedie, F. & Baayen, R.H. (1998). How variable may a constant be? Measures of lexical richness in perspective. Computers and humanities. (32). 323-352.
    • Verdonk, P. (2002). Stylistics. Oxford university press.
    • Zeif, A. (1965). Rhetoric, development and history. Cairo: House of Knowledge. [In Arabic]
    • Al-zyaat, A. (1945). Defense of Rhetoric, Cairo: Dar Al-Resala for Printing, Publishing and Media. [In Arabic]