Comparative Analysis of the Ethical Foundations of Islamic and Western Civilizations in the Face of Artificial Intelligence Crises

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor at the Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Teachings, University of Meybod, Meybod, Iran.

10.30465/afg.2025.51539.2184

Abstract

The expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) and its penetration into various aspects of human life have introduced new ethical challenges, such as injustice, lack of accountability, privacy violations, and lack of transparency. Despite significant advancements in this technology, comprehensive and effective frameworks for managing these challenges have yet to be developed. The primary issue addressed in this research is the necessity of formulating ethical frameworks to guide the proper application, design, and ethical implications of AI. Given the widespread impact of AI on economic, social, and political domains, establishing appropriate ethical principles for its sustainable and responsible use appears essential. This study employs an analytical-deductive method and a literature review in the field of technology ethics to examine Kantian ethics, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics, analyzing their applicability to the ethical challenges posed by AI. Additionally, Islamic ethics and its capacity to critique and complement traditional philosophical approaches are presented as part of the proposed solution. The findings indicate that none of the normative theories in moral philosophy alone can fully address all the ethical challenges of AI. Therefore, there is a need for a flexible and dynamic framework that can keep pace with rapid technological advancements and serve as a practical guide for developers, policymakers, and users. Islamic ethics, grounded in religion and human nature, can provide a practical alternative to the shortcomings of traditional ethical approaches and offer a comprehensive model for addressing AI-related ethical issues.
Keywords: Moral Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Deontology, Utilitarianism, Virtue Ethics, AI Challenges, Islamic Ethics
 
Introduction
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and its widespread integration into various aspects of human life have brought both significant benefits and complex ethical challenges. Issues such as privacy violations, algorithmic injustice, lack of transparency, and accountability have emerged, raising concerns about the ethical implications of AI-driven decision-making. These challenges indicate that technological progress, without proper ethical considerations, can lead to social, economic, and even legal crises. Despite numerous efforts to establish ethical guidelines for AI, a comprehensive and effective framework that can systematically address these emerging issues has yet to be fully developed. Therefore, the primary focus of this study is to examine the necessity of formulating ethical frameworks to guide, design, and ensure the responsible use of AI. In this regard, classical ethical theories such as Kantian deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics are analyzed and critiqued to assess their effectiveness in addressing AI-related ethical dilemmas. Furthermore, this study highlights the potential of Islamic ethics to offer a comprehensive ethical framework that can provide a fresh and practical approach to resolving AI’s ethical crises. The findings indicate that none of the Western normative ethical theories alone can adequately address all ethical challenges posed by AI, emphasizing the need for a flexible and dynamic framework that can adapt to the rapid advancements of this technology. In this context, Islamic ethics, with its divine and holistic perspective, emerges as a viable and effective alternative for guiding AI ethics and establishing sustainable moral principles in this domain.
 
Method and Approach
This study employs an analytical-deductive method, combining theoretical analysis with a review of relevant literature in the field of AI ethics. It examines Kantian deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics, evaluating their alignment with the ethical challenges posed by AI. Additionally, a comparative approach is utilized, critically analyzing these Western ethical theories in contrast with Islamic ethics, highlighting its capacity to offer more comprehensive solutions to AI's ethical dilemmas.
Discussion & result
This article sought to integrate classical moral theories with an analysis of the new challenges posed by artificial intelligence to propose a coherent and comprehensive ethical framework. Principles such as justice, accountability, privacy protection, and transparency must not only be fundamentally embedded in the design and implementation of AI systems but also require a dynamic approach for continuous updates in line with technological advancements.
A notable similarity between Islamic ethics and Western philosophical ethics lies in their shared objective of formulating principles for moral values and ethical conduct. While one perspective argues that ethical AI should maximize desirable outcomes for the majority, the other emphasizes a commitment to intrinsic values, which in the Islamic framework include religion, human life, and dignity. However, these ethical systems differ significantly in their sources and ultimate objectives for moral evaluation. Islamic ethics is derived from divine revelation and considers the metaphysical dimension of moral values, whereas Western normative ethics primarily focuses on rational assessment of behavior to determine what is ethical or unethical.
 
Conclutsion
Holistic Perspective: Islamic ethics addresses all dimensions of human life, both material and spiritual. Unlike secular approaches, which may be limited to worldly or individual aspects, Islam considers otherworldly well-being alongside worldly prosperity.
Flexibility within Stability: While Islamic ethical principles are immutable, they incorporate concepts such as necessity (darurah), public interest (maslahah), and the removal of hardship (raf’ al-haraj), allowing for adaptability to specific or exceptional circumstances. This contrasts with deontology, which often lacks flexibility in exceptional situations. Islam, while upholding its principles, remains responsive to contextual demands.
Balance between Individual and Society: Islamic ethics emphasizes concepts such as justice (‘adl) and equity (qist), ensuring that both individual rights and collective interests are considered. This feature enables Islam to protect the rights of minorities and vulnerable groups without compromising the common good.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 

تحلیل تطبیقی مبانی اخلاقی تمدن اسلامی و غرب در مواجهه با بحران های هوش مصنوعی

مریم السادات نبوی میبدی[1]

چکیده

گسترش هوش مصنوعی (AI) و نفوذ آن در جنبه‌های مختلف زندگی بشر، چالش‌های اخلاقی جدیدی مانند بی‌عدالتی، عدم مسئولیت‌پذیری، نقض حریم خصوصی و عدم شفافیت را به همراه داشته است. با وجود پیشرفت‌های قابل‌توجه این فناوری، هنوز چارچوب‌های جامع و مؤثری برای مدیریت این چالش‌ها تدوین نشده است. مسئله اصلی این پژوهش، بررسی ضرورت تدوین چارچوب‌های اخلاقی برای هدایت، کاربرد و طراحی صحیح هوش مصنوعی و مواجهه با پیامدهای اخلاقی آن است. با توجه به تأثیرات گسترده AI در عرصه‌های اقتصادی، اجتماعی و سیاسی، تدوین اصول اخلاقی مناسب برای استفاده پایدار و مسئولانه از این فناوری، امری ضروری به نظر می‌رسد. این پژوهش با روش تحلیلی-استنتاجی و مرور پیشینه پژوهشی در حوزه اخلاق فناوری، به بررسی نظریات اخلاقی کانتی، فایده‌گرایی و فضیلت‌محور پرداخته و تطبیق آن‌ها را با چالش‌های اخلاقی هوش مصنوعی مورد تحلیل قرار داده است. همچنین خوانش اخلاق اسلامی و ظرفیت‌های آن در نقد و تکمیل رویکردهای سنتی فلسفه اخلاق، به‌عنوان بخشی از راهکار ارائه شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که هیچ‌یک از نظریه‌های هنجاری فلسفه اخلاق به‌تنهایی قادر به پاسخگویی به تمامی چالش‌های اخلاقی هوش مصنوعی نیستند؛ بنابراین، نیاز به چارچوبی منعطف و پویا احساس می‌شود که بتواند با پیشرفت سریع فناوری هماهنگ شود و به‌عنوان راهنمای عملی برای توسعه‌دهندگان، سیاست‌گذاران و کاربران عمل کند. اخلاق اسلامی، به‌واسطه تکیه ‌بر دین و فطرت انسانی، می‌تواند جایگزینی کاربردی برای کاستی‌های رویکردهای فلسفه اخلاق ارائه دهد و الگویی جامع برای مواجهه با مسائل اخلاقی ناشی از هوش مصنوعی به ‌دست دهد.

 

کلید واژگان: فلسفه اخلاق، هوش مصنوعی، وظیفه گرایی، فایده­گرایی، اخلاق فضیلت، چالشهای هوش مصنوعی، اخلاق اسلامی

[1] - استادیار گروه معارف دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی دانشگاه میبد، میبد، ایران.ایمیل nabavi@meybod.ac.ir

این مقاله مستخرج از طرح پژوهشی با عنوان تألیف کتاب «زیست اخلاقی اسلامی در مواجهه با چالشهای اخلاقی هوش مصنوعی» می­باشد که با حمایت پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی در حال انتشار است.

Books
The Holy Quran
Anderson, M. & Anderson, S. L. (Eds.) (2011). Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Aristotle (1999). Nicomachean Ethics. Hackett Publishing Company.
Asaro, P. M. (2007). Robots and Responsibility from a Legal Perspective, In P. Lin, K. Abney. & G. A.
Ayashi, Muhammad ibn Masoud (2001). Tafseer al-Ayashi, Tehran: Al-Matba'a al-Ilmiyah. [in Arabic]
Azylbekova, G. O. (2024). On the Question of Formation of Utilitarian Values of a Linguistic Personality, Toraighyrov University, Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana.
Bentham, J. (1879). The Principles of Morals and Legislation. Clarendon Press.
Binns, R. (2018). "Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy," In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency.
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.
Cathy O'N. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group.
Hayes, P, Fitzpatrick, N, Ferrández, J. M. (2024). "From Applied Ethics and Ethical Principles to Virtue and Narrative in AI Practices," AI and Ethics.
Herman T. Tavani.(2011) "Ethics and Technology: Controversies, Questions, and Strategies for Ethical", Wiley, 978-0470500950.
Hooker, J. N. & Wan Kim, T. (2018). "Toward Non-Intuition-Based Machine Ethics," Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.
Jakob, O. (2024). "Virtues for AI," VU University Amsterdam.
Jawadi Amoli, Abdullah (1990). Karamat in the Quran, Tehran: Rija Publications. [in Persian]
Kant, I. (1948). The Moral Law: Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Translated by H.J. Paton. Routledge.
Kant, I. (1960). Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone. Translated by T.M. Greene & H.H. Hudson. Harper Torchbooks.
Kusmaryant, C. (2022). "Dignity of Human Life in Bioethics," Graduate School, Sanata Dharma University, Indonesia.
Macintyre, A. (1981). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
Mill, John Stuart (2009). Utilitarianism, Translated and Annotated by: Morteza Mardihya, Tehran: Ney Publishing. [in Persian]
Misbah Yazdi, Muhammad Taqi (2005). Critical Review of Ethical Schools, Research and Writing: Ahmad Hussein Sharifi, Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. [in Persian]
Misbah Yazdi, Muhammad Taqi (2007). The Teachings of the Quran (Theology, Cosmology, Anthropology), 1st Edition, Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. [in Persian]
Misbah Yazdi, Muhammad Taqi (2012). The Legal Theory of Islam, Research and Writing: Muhammad Mahdi Naderi Qomi and Muhammad Mahdi Karimi Nia, Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. [in Persian]
Motahari, Morteza (1997). Social Evolution of Humans, 11th Edition, Tehran: Sadra Publications. [in Persian]
Motahari, Morteza (1999). Collected Works, Tehran: Sadra. [in Persian]
Naraqi, Ahmad ibn Muhammad Mahdi (2019). Miraj al-Sa'ada, Qom: Hijrat. [in Persian]
Nick, B. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.
Ragheb Isfahani, Hussein ibn Muhammad (2004). Mufradat fi Gharib al-Quran, Tehran: Al-Ketabah al-Murtazaviya Li Ahya' Asha'r Ja'afariyah. [in Persian]
Rawls, J.(1971) A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. Section 5,30
Tabatabai, Sayyid Muhammad Hussain (1988). Tafseer al-Mizan, Translated by: Sayyid Muhammad Baqir Mousavi Hamadani, Vol. 1, Qom: Islamic Publishing. [in Persian]
Tamiami Amidi, Abdulwahid ibn Muhammad (2005). Ghorar al-Hekam wa Dorar al-Kalam: A Collection of Words and Wisdoms of Imam Ali (a), Qom: Dar al-Kitab al-Islami. [in Arabic]
 
Articles
Afzali, Mohammad Ali (2010). "Human Dignity and Euthanasia from the Perspective of Islamic Ethics," Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences Journal, Vol. 20, Issue 78, pp. 83-95. )In Persion)
Arabi, Hadi (2015). "Justice in the Thought of Utilitarianism," Humanities Methodology Quarterly, Vol. 21, Issue 84, pp. 65-86. )In Persion)
Baharnejad, Zakaria (2013). "Virtue from Mulla Sadra's Perspective," Khordnameh Sadra Journal, Issue 74, pp. 23-42. )In Persion)
Baker-Brunnbauer, J. (2021). "Management Perspective of Ethics in Artificial Intelligence", AI and Ethics, 1(2), 173-181.
Derek C. S. (2023). "Virtue and Artificial Intelligence," Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith, Vol. 75, Issue 3, 155.
Gardiner, P. (2003-10-01). "A Virtue Ethics Approach to Moral Dilemmas in Medicine," Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(5): 297–302.
Islami, Sayyid Hassan (2008). "Virtue Ethics and Its Relation to Islamic Ethics," Journal of Ethics Research, Issue 1, pp. 1-22.) In Persion)
Karataş, M. & Cutright, K. M. (2023). "Thinking about God Increases Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Decision-Making," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(33), e2218961120.
Khoirunnisa, A. et al. (2023). "Islam in the Midst of AI (Artificial Intelligence) Struggles: Between Opportunities and Threats," SUHUF, 35(1), 45-50.
Khonsari, Mohammad Amin (2022). "Evaluation of Kant's Deontological Theory from the Perspective of Islamic Ethics," Ethical Research Journal, Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 73-94. )In Persion)
Morvarid, Jafar (2021). "Compatibility of Virtue Theory with Religious Ethics," Ethical Research, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 219-236. )In Persion)
Reed, R. (2021). "AI in Religion, AI for Religion, AI and Religion: Towards a Theory of Religious Studies and Artificial Intelligence," Religions, 12(6), 3.
Rümelin, J.N & Weidenfeld, N. (2022). "Digital Optimization, Utilitarianism, and AI," In Digital Humanism: For a Humane Transformation of Democracy, Economy, and Culture in the Digital Age. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 31-34.
Saihu, M. (2022). "Al-Qur’an and the Need for Islamic Education to Artificial Intelligence," Al-Quron dan Keislaman, Journal Study Al-Qur’an dan Keislaman, 2(5): 18-31.
Sebo, J. (2023). "The Rebugnant Conclusion: Utilitarianism, Insects, Microbes, and AI Systems," Ethics, Policy & Environment, 26(2), 249-264.
Ulgen, O. (2017). "Kantian Ethics in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics," QIL, 43, 59-83.
Vallor, S. (2009). "Social Networking Technology and the Virtues," Ethics and Information Technology, 12(2), 157–170.